There is an ongoing battle between cyclists and just about everyone else â€“ motorists donâ€™t want them on the roads, pedestrians (like me) donâ€™t want them on the footpaths. The issue is a perennial filler for Sydney newspapers and has flared again this week in news stories, opinion pieces and letters to the editor.
In Australia, those who argue on the cyclistsâ€™ side point to the way in which cities in other developed countries have embraced the bicycle â€“ but itâ€™s not necessarily all plainÂ cycling overseas. Apparently one of the great battlefields in the war between bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists is the Brooklyn Bridge in New York.Â Robert Sullivan, calling for an armistice, writes in the New York Times: â€œThe stripe painted down the center of the elevated Brooklyn Bridge walkway, to separate bicyclists from pedestrians, has become a line in the sand. We need to erase that line once and for all.â€ Here is an example where the record of a territorial struggle has been written on the pavement itself.
Almost every sign, symbol, graphic and graffiti marked on the roads and sidewalks is a claim for territory. The two examples photographed for todayâ€™s blog record instances where pedestrians have had a victory over cyclists, officially at least, and probably only temporarily. The ineptly obliterated bicycle symbol overpainted with a â€˜Pedestrian traffic onlyâ€™ stencil was on the bridge at the corner of St Kilda Road and Flinders Street in Melbourne in 2005. The â€˜Give wayâ€™ stencils appeared in parks in the City of Sydney towards the end of 2008 after many complaints from pedestrian park-users.